I’m a member of a sports club that has a swimming pool and gym – both of which require a valid medical certificate before the club will let me in to use the facilities.
This is bit annoying. Every gym I have used in the past in every country I have travelled to just relied on self-certification – you make your own choice to be there in the gym and they are not liable if you have any health problems.
But this is Brazil – there is often a need for a piece of paper to be signed when it might be better to just shake hands or trust in people. Nevertheless, I went off to the local GP to get a certificate.
“Are you feeling OK?” he asked.
“Yes, no problems,” I replied.
He stamped the paper and gave it to me. He didn’t check my pulse, temperature, blood pressure – nothing.
What’s worse than having to get a medical certificate every three months so I can go and exercise at the gym? How about the doctor not even bothering to check if I am actually OK anyway.
The reality is that this is only a mild annoyance, but it’s symptomatic of wider issues around bureaucracy in Brazil. Just because a process exists does not mean that there is a reason for it to exist. Someone should question it.
My gym could easily put a sign on the wall saying ‘by entering this room you accept liability for your own health and cannot sue us…’ But if they did that, the doctors would probably complain about all the cash they are losing, just by taking a few seconds to stamp a form.
Who is right and who is wrong?
Photo by Rooner’s toy photography licensed under Creative Commons